The Short Answer
| Configuration | Indicative size | Derived rate | Indicative price | Register |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 BHK | 1,200 sqft super built-up | Rs 11,500 per sqft | ~Rs 1.38 Cr | Derived |
| 3 BHK | 1,650 sqft super built-up | Rs 11,500 per sqft | ~Rs 1.90 Cr | Derived |
| 4 BHK | 2,300 sqft super built-up | Rs 11,500 per sqft | ~Rs 2.65 Cr | Derived |
Indicative rate band across the scheme: Rs 10,800 to Rs 12,600 per sqft, central Rs 11,500. Honest price bands, carrying both the size uncertainty and the rate uncertainty: Rs 1.24-1.51 Cr for the two-bedroom home, Rs 1.62-2.33 Cr for the three-bedroom, Rs 2.32-3.15 Cr for the four-bedroom.
None of these is a quoted price. The sizes are derived, the rate is derived, and the product of two derived numbers is an estimate twice over.
3 BHK Apartment
~Rs 1.90 Cr (derived)4 BHK Apartment
~Rs 2.65 Cr (derived)Method One: What the Corridor Actually Charges
Seven projects on and around this corridor have independently sourced rates. None of them is ours, and none of the figures below is taken from marketing material for this project.
| Project | Position | Rate per sqft |
|---|---|---|
| Assetz Bloom & Dell | This road, Doddabanahalli, listed by the developer as completed | Rs 10,800 |
| Godrej Parkshire | Hoskote taluk, registered January 2026, 14 acres / 1,132 homes | Rs 11,100 |
| Sattva Songbird | Budigere Cross | Rs 12,600 |
| Godrej Woodscapes | Budigere Cross | ~Rs 13,000 |
| Brigade Belvedere | Budigere Cross, registered March 2026 | Rs 13,475 |
| A 17-acre joint development | Whitefield-Kannamangala belt, Rs 3,500 Cr gross value over 2.5 million sqft | Rs 14,000 |
| Sobha One World | Old Madras Road side, registered May 2026 | Rs 14,720 |
Setting the floor at Rs 10,800. This is the hardest single number available anywhere near this project: it is Assetz's own current ask, for its own delivered product, on this exact road. Two independent checks agree on it — Bloom & Dell's three-bedroom homes are quoted at Rs 1.99 Cr for 1,839 sqft and Rs 2.20 Cr for 2,039 sqft, which solve to Rs 10,821 and Rs 10,790 per sqft. A new project by the same developer, on the same road, at a materially lower rate than its own completed community is a claim that needs explaining, not a bargain that needs celebrating.
Setting the ceiling at Rs 12,600. Sattva Songbird at Budigere Cross is the nearest new-launch premium comparable in the eastern belt. The band deliberately stops below Brigade Belvedere, Sobha One World and the 17-acre joint development's underwriting, because those sit at Budigere Cross, on Old Madras Road and closer to the Whitefield core respectively — three different micro-markets. The locality asking rates for the belt this project is actually placed in run far lower: Kannamangala around Rs 10,450, Kadugodi Rs 9,600, Belathur Rs 8,850 and Seegehalli (Bangalore East) Rs 7,850, against Whitefield at Rs 14,450.
The central figure. The midpoint of Rs 10,800 and Rs 12,600 is Rs 11,700; rounded down to the nearest Rs 500 that is Rs 11,500 per sqft. Rounding down rather than to the nearest is deliberate — overstating a rate on an unregistered project is the higher-harm error. The result also lands just above Godrej Parkshire at Rs 11,100, which is the closest analogue anywhere on this corridor by scale, product class and vintage.
Multiply through:
- 2 BHK: 1,200 × 11,500 = Rs 1,38,00,000
- 3 BHK: 1,650 × 11,500 = Rs 1,89,75,000
- 4 BHK: 2,300 × 11,500 = Rs 2,64,50,000
Method Two: What the Developer's Own Numbers Imply
The second route ignores the corridor entirely and asks a narrower question: what does Assetz itself currently charge for a three-bedroom home in East Bengaluru?
Two answers exist, and both are published.
Its completed community on this road. Three-bedroom homes at 1,839 and 2,039 sqft, quoted at Rs 1.99 Cr and Rs 2.20 Cr. That is Rs 10,821 and Rs 10,790 per sqft — a delivered product, on this corridor, at a real ask rather than an inferred one.
Its other East Bengaluru pre-launch. Three-bedroom homes of 1,735 to 1,945 sqft, quoted from Rs 1.93 Cr. Divide through and the implied rate runs Rs 9,920 to Rs 11,120 per sqft depending on which end of the size range that opening price attaches to — and an opening price almost always attaches to the smallest plate, which puts the working figure at the upper end of that range.
So the developer's own current three-bedroom pricing in East Bengaluru sits between roughly Rs 10,800 and Rs 11,100 per sqft, and its own opening three-bedroom ticket is Rs 1.93 Cr.
Where the Two Methods Meet
This is the strongest thing on the page, and it is worth stating precisely because it is the one place two independent routes agree.
- Route one, from corridor comparables: Rs 11,500 per sqft against a derived 1,650 sqft three-bedroom home gives Rs 1.90 Cr.
- Route two, from the developer's own other East Bengaluru pre-launch: a three-bedroom home from Rs 1.93 Cr.
Those two are 1.6% apart. Neither was calibrated to the other — one is built from seven third-party project rates, the other from a single developer quotation for a different project — and they land within three lakh rupees of each other on a two-crore ticket.
That agreement does not prove Rs 1.90 Cr is what this project will cost. It proves that a three-bedroom Assetz home in East Bengaluru, at today's rates, is a roughly Rs 1.9 to 1.95 crore object. Any figure materially away from that needs a reason attached to it.
The Ladder in Circulation, and What It Implies at These Sizes
The pre-launch material in circulation carries three rungs: Rs 1.15 Cr, Rs 1.45 Cr and Rs 1.95 Cr. It carries no sizes, no rate and no configuration areas, which is why it cannot be published on this site as a price. What it can be is tested.
Test one: divide by this site's derived sizes.
| Rung in circulation | Against this site's derived size | Implied rate per sqft |
|---|---|---|
| Rs 1.15 Cr | 1,200 sqft | Rs 9,583 |
| Rs 1.45 Cr | 1,650 sqft | Rs 8,788 |
| Rs 1.95 Cr | 2,300 sqft | Rs 8,478 |
Three points about that table, in order of importance.
The level is the finding, not the shape. Even the most generous of the three implied rates, Rs 9,583, sits below every verified comparable on this corridor — including the developer's own completed community on this same road.
The shape is unremarkable. The implied rate falls as the home gets larger, across a spread of about Rs 1,105 per sqft. That pattern is ordinary: developers routinely build a whole configuration ladder off one base rate and let the effective per-sqft figure drift with plate size, balcony ratio and position. Nothing about the internal structure of these three numbers is anomalous, and nothing about it can be read as evidence of anything. Only the level can.
The arithmetic depends entirely on the sizes, which are ours. Change the assumed sizes and every implied rate in that table changes with them. It is a test of the ladder against the sizes this corridor builds, not a decoding of somebody's cost sheet.
Test two: run it the other way. Instead of assuming sizes, assume the rate the developer actually charges on this road — Rs 10,800 per sqft — and ask what each rung would buy.
| Rung in circulation | Size it buys at Rs 10,800 per sqft |
|---|---|
| Rs 1.15 Cr | ~1,065 sqft |
| Rs 1.45 Cr | ~1,343 sqft |
| Rs 1.95 Cr | ~1,806 sqft |
This is the sharper of the two tests, because it uses no derived input at all. A three-bedroom home at 1,343 sqft would be smaller than any three-bedroom home Assetz currently sells on this corridor — its own delivered product runs 1,839 to 2,039 sqft — and smaller than any three-bedroom home found anywhere on this stretch of road. A four-bedroom home at 1,806 sqft would be smaller than the smallest verified four-bedroom plate on the corridor, which is 2,100 sqft.
So either the homes are materially smaller than anything this corridor builds, or the rate is materially below anything this corridor charges. There is no third arrangement in which that ladder is both real and market-consistent.
How the Implied Rate Sits Against Verified Comparables
Take the most generous reading of the ladder — Rs 9,583 per sqft, the highest of the three implied rates — and hold it against the corridor.
| Comparable | Rate per sqft | Position of the implied ~Rs 9,580 |
|---|---|---|
| Assetz Bloom & Dell, this road | Rs 10,800 | -11% |
| Godrej Parkshire, Hoskote taluk | Rs 11,100 | -14% |
| Sattva Songbird, Budigere Cross | Rs 12,600 | -24% |
| Brigade Belvedere, Budigere Cross | Rs 13,475 | -29% |
| Sobha One World, Old Madras Road side | Rs 14,720 | -35% |
A genuine expression-of-interest discount runs 8 to 15%. That is what the mechanism is for: a developer trades a real but modest price advantage for early demand signal and a book of interest before launch. It does not run 25 to 35%, and a developer does not open below its own delivered product on the same road.
The only project found trading under Rs 10,000 per sqft anywhere on this corridor is Brigade Calista at Budigere, at Rs 9,187 — a 2023-vintage value-tier scheme, not a low-density premium high-rise. A small-format entrant on this road lists 184 homes on 1.6 acres from around Rs 56 lakh. Neither is a comparable for a scheme described as 725 homes on 15 acres at roughly 48 homes to the acre.
And that density point cuts directly into the price question. Low density and large floor plates push a ticket up, not down. At the derived sizes the scheme carries about 1.21 million sqft of saleable area on 15 acres — a saleable-area ratio of about 1.85, well under what a parcel of this size and road class would permit. Unbuilt permissible area is expensive, and somebody pays for it in the per-sqft rate. A 48-homes-per-acre master plan and a Rs 1.15 Cr entry price are not naturally compatible. Aparna Wonder Woods keeps the budget lens practical: the final decision depends on cash flow, taxes, parking, floor-rise, furnishing allowance, and how much room the buyer leaves for surprises.
The reconciliation offered in circulation is that the 700-750 home count covers "early phases" only. That is a coherent explanation and it is entirely unresolved — nothing published tells you whether 725 is the whole scheme or the first slice of a larger one.
The Single Sharpest Check: the Developer's Own Opening Ticket
Set aside the per-sqft arithmetic and compare like with like.
Assetz's own other East Bengaluru pre-launch opens at Rs 1.93 Cr for a three-bedroom home. Its own completed community on this very road sells three-bedroom homes at Rs 1.99 to 2.20 Cr. The three-bedroom rung circulating for this project is Rs 1.45 Cr.
That is a gap of roughly Rs 48 lakh against the developer's own opening price for the same configuration in the same half of the city, and roughly Rs 54 to 75 lakh against its own delivered product on the same road. No feature of this project explains it: it is not a smaller-format scheme, it is not further from the employment cluster than the developer's other pre-launch, and at half the corridor's density it is if anything the more expensive product to build.
This is the finding a buyer most deserves from this page, and it is the reason we publish a derived Rs 1.90 Cr rather than a circulating Rs 1.45 Cr.
Asking Rates, Registered Rates, and a Caution About Both
Two further layers are worth understanding before any of the numbers above are used as a valuation.
Registered transaction rates across this corridor run 27 to 45% below asking rates. Whitefield shows asking Rs 14,650 against a registered Rs 7,750; Krishnarajapura asking Rs 11,191 against a registered Rs 6,100. That looks like evidence that every asking rate on this page is inflated, and it is not. Indian registered consideration frequently tracks the state guidance value rather than true market consideration, so registered rates are a guidance-value floor, not an independent market price. Use them to understand what the sub-registrar will treat as the taxable base — which matters directly for stamp duty — not to argue a project is worth 40% less than it asks.
Every locality figure on this page rests on a single source. One portal is the only one that permits retrieval; the other major listing sites refuse it. That portal's own series for this belt contains a stale headline, a single-quarter jump widely misreported as an annual change, a stuck default rental value and sub-locality tables recycled across unrelated pages. We have used its locality rates only as a gradient — the shape of the price surface from Whitefield outward — and never as a valuation input. The seven project rates in the table above are separately sourced and do not depend on it.
What It Actually Costs to Acquire
The apartment price is not the cost of ownership, and on a pre-launch project the difference is larger than usual because none of the project-specific charges has been published. Worked below against the derived three-bedroom home at Rs 1,89,75,000.
| Component | Basis | Indicative amount | Register |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base consideration | 1,650 sqft × Rs 11,500 | Rs 1,89,75,000 | Derived |
| Floor rise | Charged per sqft per floor above a threshold | Rs 0 - 8,00,000 | Not published |
| Preferential location charge | Corner, garden-facing, high floor | Rs 0 - 6,00,000 | Not published |
| Car parking, where charged separately | Per bay | Rs 3,00,000 - 6,00,000 | Not published |
| Club membership | One-time | Rs 1,50,000 - 3,00,000 | Not published |
| Maintenance corpus / advance maintenance | One-time, at handover | Rs 3,00,000 - 5,00,000 | Not published |
| Infrastructure and development charges | Where applicable | Rs 2,00,000 - 4,00,000 | Not published |
| Sub-total before statutory charges | Rs 1,99,25,000 - 2,21,75,000 | ||
| GST | 5% on under-construction, no input tax credit | Rs 9,96,000 - 11,09,000 | Statutory |
| Stamp duty | 5% above Rs 45 lakh (Karnataka) | Rs 9,96,000 - 11,09,000 | Statutory |
| Registration | 1% | Rs 1,99,000 - 2,22,000 | Statutory |
| Cess and scanning | ~0.6% | Rs 1,20,000 - 1,33,000 | Statutory |
| Legal and documentation | Rs 25,000 - 75,000 | Buyer's scope | |
| Total acquisition cost | ≈ Rs 2.23 Cr - 2.48 Cr | ||
| Fit-out and interiors | Optional, buyer's scope | Rs 12,00,000 - 35,00,000 | Buyer's scope |
The planning rule. Statutory charges alone come to about 11.6% of the agreement value — 5% GST, 5% stamp duty, 1% registration and roughly 0.6% in cess and scanning. On a Rs 1.90 Cr agreement that is close to Rs 22 lakh, none of which is fundable by a home loan. Budget it as cash, separately from the deposit.
On stamp duty, and one point specific to this belt. Karnataka levies 5% stamp duty on residential property above Rs 45 lakh, plus 1% registration, plus a cess and surcharge levied as a percentage of the stamp duty — around 6.6% all in. Duty is charged on the guidance value or the transaction value, whichever is higher. Here is the catch on this project: guidance value is set survey-number by survey-number, and no survey number, parcel or address has been disclosed for this project, so the guidance value applicable to it cannot be looked up. Separately, the local-body component of the surcharge depends on which body the land falls under, and this stretch — Bidarahalli Hobli, Bengaluru East Taluk, PIN 560115 — sits outside any city corporation. Both are questions for the sub-registrar once a parcel exists, not questions a brochure can answer.
On GST. Under-construction residential property attracts 5% GST with no input tax credit. It ceases to apply once a project receives its occupancy certificate, which is why a ready home and an under-construction home carry different cost structures for the same headline price.
On maintenance, which is the recurring cost people forget. Corridor norms for an amenity-heavy high-rise run Rs 3.50 to Rs 5.00 per sqft per month. On a 1,650 sqft home that is Rs 5,800 to Rs 8,300 a month, or Rs 70,000 to Rs 99,000 a year, from handover, and it rises. Ask for the projected charge at full occupancy, not the introductory rate — those are routinely different numbers.
Payment Plans, and Why None Exists Yet
No payment plan can be offered for this project today. Under Section 3 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, a project in this class may not lawfully be advertised, booked or sold until it is registered, and no booking form or agreement to sell can be executed before that date. What follows is what this corridor's registered projects offer, so you know what to expect and what to compare.
Construction-linked plan. The default and generally the safest. Typically 10% at booking, 10-15% at agreement, then instalments against verifiable milestones — foundation, each slab, blockwork, plastering, finishing — with around 5% retained until possession. On a handover that may be six years out, the advantage is real: your outflow tracks actual progress, and a construction delay becomes a delay in your payment obligation rather than only in your possession.
Down-payment plan. 90-95% within 30-60 days of booking, against a discount of typically 4-7% on the base rate. On a Rs 1.90 Cr home a 5% discount is about Rs 9.5 lakh. The trade-off is that you carry the entire construction risk for the full period with no payment leverage left.
Possession-linked or flexi plan. A larger upfront tranche, typically 30-40%, then a long gap, then the balance at possession, usually at a smaller discount than the down-payment plan.
For a horizon of this length, the construction-linked plan is the right default unless the down-payment discount clearly exceeds your cost of capital over the period. At 5% over six years, it does not.
And the specific caution for a pre-registration project. Any amount paid before registration sits outside the Act's escrow provisions, and there is no committed delivery date for a regulator to enforce because there is no registration to carry one. If you are asked for an expression-of-interest amount, get the refund terms in writing, get them read by your own lawyer rather than the sales desk's, and establish whether the amount is adjustable, refundable, or neither.
A Loan Illustration, on Stated Assumptions
This is an illustration, not advice, and every input is an assumption you should replace with your own lender's terms.
Take the derived three-bedroom home at Rs 1,89,75,000. Because the ticket exceeds Rs 75 lakh, the maximum loan-to-value ratio permitted is 75%, so the largest loan against the base consideration is about Rs 1.42 Cr — and the remaining Rs 47.4 lakh, plus the roughly Rs 22 lakh of statutory charges, must come from your own funds. That is close to Rs 70 lakh in cash before interiors.
Assume a round 8.5% a year over a 20-year term. That gives an equated monthly instalment of approximately Rs 1,23,500, a total repayment of about Rs 2.96 Cr, and roughly Rs 1.54 Cr paid in interest over the life of the loan — more than 80% of the price of the home again. On the common lending rule that the instalment should not exceed 40% of net monthly income, that implies a household net income of around Rs 3.1 lakh a month.
The assumed rate is a round working figure chosen for illustration. Use your own sanctioned rate, and rerun the arithmetic if your term is not 20 years.
One practical constraint on all of it. Most lenders will not sanction a home loan against a project that is not RERA registered, and many will not issue an approved-project number until the registration and sanctioned plan exist. Treat loan eligibility on this project as unavailable for now rather than as a formality.
Rental Yield, Derived and Labelled
No rental yield series is published for the Seegehalli-Kannamangala belt at all. What exists nearby: Old Madras Road at a published 3.73% gross on average rents of about Rs 35 per sqft a month, Budigere at 3.11% on about Rs 31, and Whitefield at 2.95% on about Rs 36.
Apply that rent range to this project's derived rate and the arithmetic is straightforward — monthly rent per sqft, times twelve, divided by the capital rate per sqft:
- At Rs 31 per sqft a month against Rs 11,500 per sqft: 3.2% gross
- At Rs 36 per sqft a month against Rs 11,500 per sqft: 3.8% gross
That is a normal Bengaluru result — in line with the corridor and unremarkable. Net yield typically runs 0.5 to 0.8 percentage points below gross once maintenance, property tax, periodic repainting, insurance and a vacancy allowance are deducted, so a 3.5% gross is a 2.8% net in practice.
One trap to avoid. Run the same rents against the ladder in circulation and the gross yield computes at 3.9 to 4.5%, which looks like an unusually strong investment case. It is not a finding. A higher yield at a lower price is arithmetic, not evidence — it is a consequence of pricing below the market, and it would evaporate the moment the price moved to the market. A yield calculated off a price nobody has committed to tells you nothing about the asset.
What a Buyer Cannot Yet Know
It is worth being explicit about the size of the hole, because most of it will not close until the developer publishes documents.
- The rate. No cost sheet exists. The Rs 11,500 per sqft on this page is derived from other people's projects.
- The sizes. No area statement exists. Every configuration size on this site is inferred from corridor comparables.
- The parcel. No survey number, no address, no extent. That means no guidance value, no khata position, no title chain and no encumbrance certificate can be examined by anyone.
- The charges. Floor rise, preferential location charges, parking, club membership, corpus and infrastructure charges are unpublished. On a two-crore home those can plausibly total Rs 15 to 30 lakh, and they are the components most often introduced late.
- The phase. Whether 725 homes is the whole scheme or an early phase is unresolved, and it changes the density, the amenity ratio and the price logic.
- The registration. Assetz Nari & Nami is not registered with Karnataka RERA. A parse of the state project registry — 9,880 rows, checked in August 2026 — returns no registration under this name for any Assetz or APG-family promoter entity, and no pending application is published. Until registration exists there is no enforceable price, no enforceable area, no enforceable date, and no escrow protection on anything you pay.
- The name. "Nari & Nami" is a working reference the developer has not announced, so even the object these prices attach to is provisional.
Before You Pay Anything
- Check the registration yourself at rera.karnataka.gov.in, by project name and by address rather than by the Assetz brand — the developer registers through per-project special purpose vehicles, several of which carry no Assetz token. Confirm any number you are shown is project class, in the form
PRM/KA/RERA/.../PR/...; an agent-class number in the same shape says nothing about whether a project is approved. - Ask for the cost sheet with carpet and super built-up stated together, configuration by configuration, so you can compute the rate per sqft yourself and see whether it moves between configurations.
- Ask for the full charge list in one document — base rate, floor rise, preferential location charge, parking, club, corpus, infrastructure charges, and the projected maintenance rate per sqft at full occupancy.
- Establish which phase you are buying in and the registration number for that phase specifically. The certificate that governs your home is your phase's, with its own extent, unit count, price obligations and completion date.
- Get the guidance value for the actual survey numbers once a parcel is disclosed, because stamp duty is charged on that or on the consideration, whichever is higher.
- Read the refund terms on any pre-launch amount with your own lawyer. Before registration there is no escrow and no enforceable date, and the terms of an expression-of-interest payment are entirely a matter of the paper you sign.
- Compare on carpet area and on all-in cost, never on headline size and headline price. At the 68% ratio the developer publishes on this road, the honest cost of the floor you can actually walk on is closer to Rs 16,900 per sqft than to Rs 11,500.
Enquire about Assetz Nari & Nami
Register a non-binding interest and we will send you the sanctioned plan, the Karnataka RERA certificate and the developer's own cost sheet the day each one is published – and tell you plainly, until then, that none of them exists.
Register Your InterestAssetz Nari & Nami Pricing – Frequently Asked Questions
Why does this site not publish the price ladder circulating ahead of launch?
Because it carries no sizes, no rate and no configuration areas, and because the level it implies does not survive contact with the corridor. Three rungs are in circulation at Rs 1.15 Cr, Rs 1.45 Cr and Rs 1.95 Cr. Divide each by the size this site derives for that configuration — 1,200, 1,650 and 2,300 sqft — and the implied rates are Rs 9,583, Rs 8,788 and Rs 8,478 per sqft. The level is the finding here, not the shape: a per-sqft figure that eases downward as the plate grows is ordinary practice, because developers routinely price a ladder off one base rate and let loading, balcony ratio and floor rise move the effective number, so nothing in the internal structure of those three rungs is evidence of anything. It is also worth saying that the arithmetic rests on sizes that are ours, and changes with them. What the level shows is this: even the most generous of the three, Rs 9,583 per sqft, sits 11% below the developer's own product on this same road, 14% below Godrej Parkshire, 24% below Sattva Songbird, 29% below Brigade Belvedere and 35% below Sobha One World, and a genuine expression-of-interest discount runs 8-15%, not 25-35%. A second consideration reinforces the caution: the same unusual configuration ladder, on the same road, in the same enquiry window, with the same Rs 1.45 Cr figure, is being marketed by an unrelated developer's unregistered pre-launch nearby.
Set against that, the derived estimate has a convergence the circulating ladder does not. Two independent routes land on the same 3 BHK number, which is the strongest single thing on this site's price working. Route one is comparables: Rs 11,500 per sqft across a 1,650 sqft plate gives Rs 1,89,75,000, about Rs 1.90 Cr. Route two is the developer's own current pricing: its other East Bengaluru pre-launch is quoted from Rs 1.93 Cr for a three-bedroom home which the developer's own listing puts at 1,735-1,945 sqft and a channel partner marketing the same project puts at 1,608-1,849 sqft — the sources differ by roughly a hundred square feet at each end, which is itself worth knowing about pre-launch sizes. Its completed community on this very road sells three-bedroom homes at Rs 1.99-2.20 Cr. Rs 1.90 Cr and Rs 1.93 Cr are 1.6% apart. Held the other way, the circulating Rs 1.45 Cr against Bloom & Dell's own Rs 10,800 per sqft buys 1,343 sqft — smaller than any three-bedroom home Assetz sells on this corridor and smaller than any found on it.
Can I get a home loan on a pre-launch project that is not RERA registered?
Not as a project-linked loan, no. Lenders extend project approval — the APF, or approved project finance, listing that banks and housing finance companies publish — on the strength of sanctioned plans, clean title and the RERA registration. Until a project is registered there is nothing for a lender to approve, so no disbursement can be linked to it. You may well obtain an in-principle sanction based on your own income and credit profile, and that is worth having in hand, but it is a statement about you and not about this project. Ask your lender directly which of their approved-project lists this scheme appears on; if the answer is none, that is the correct answer for an unregistered project and not a red flag in itself.
What is Assetz Nari & Nami, and what is actually established about it?
It is a pre-launch residential apartment scheme referred to as Assetz Nari and Nami, described in information circulating ahead of launch as sitting on the Whitefield-Hoskote Road (SH-35) corridor in Bengaluru East. What is established is the corridor, not the project. There is no Karnataka RERA registration, no developer-published cost sheet, no sanctioned plan in the public domain, and no disclosed parcel, survey number or street address. The developer's own catalogue of 32 projects does not list it, and its own upcoming-projects page carries three items, none of them this one. Everything on this site that concerns the project itself — land area, unit count, tower count, unit sizes, pricing and possession — is either attributed to the pre-launch information in circulation or independently derived here, and both classes are labelled wherever they appear.
What is an EOI, and what happens to the amount if the project never launches?
An expression of interest is a pre-registration signal that you would like to be considered for allotment when a project opens, usually in exchange for priority in tower, floor and unit selection. It is not a booking and it does not create an allotment right. Because the project cannot lawfully accept a booking before registration, the only honest form an EOI can take here is a refundable amount held against a written, dated undertaking that names the receiving entity, states the refund trigger and states the refund period. Get that in writing before any money moves, pay only by traceable bank transfer to a named entity, and refuse any receipt that describes the amount as a booking, an allotment or an advance against sale consideration. If the scheme never launches, your recourse is the contractual undertaking you hold, because the regulator's machinery does not cover an unregistered project.
Is "Nari & Nami" the confirmed project name?
No. Treat it as a working reference. The reason this matters is a pattern in the developer's own naming: the paired "X & Y" form — Bloom & Dell, Miru & Miyo, Zen & Sato, Sora & Saki, Muse & Maison and sixteen others — is the name Assetz attaches to a project at launch, alongside a registration, in twenty confirmed cases. Its genuine pre-registration working titles take a completely different form, "Assetz Codename" followed by a single English word, in eleven confirmed cases. So a paired name carrying no registration is unusual, and the name should be expected to change, or to resolve into something else entirely, when the project is announced.